Peeking at the data: looks during a trial
A drug does nothing. If you check the results again and again, will you fool yourself?
The truth, and what the trial sees
Nobody can see the true response rates. The trial sees only patients, a few more at each look.
True (hidden)
Seen so far
filled = got better outline = did not faded = not yet enrolled
| Look | Patients per group | Got better: placebo | Got better: drug | Gap | p, one-sided |
|---|
A trial with planned looks
The strict early bars come from a spending formula (Lan-DeMets), so they differ a little from the textbook O’Brien-Fleming bars. At each look an independent safety board (DSMB) checks the data.
1. How many looks?
2. Which rule?
3. Does the drug work?
Run
Each trial: 100 patients. Each simulated patient's result is a measurement on a bell curve. This approximates yes/no outcomes in big trials.
z: how big the gap is compared with luck. Above 1.96 on the drug’s side is the usual bar, one-sided p below 0.025 (module 2). Only the drug’s good side is drawn.
100 simulated trials, one dot each
Chance that a useless drug gives a false alarm
False alarm: the trial stops though the drug does nothing.
Will the trial win if it keeps going?
Posterior: how sure we are today that the drug is better. Predictive probability: the chance the trial ends in a win if it runs to the end, given the data so far.
Plan: 100 patients per arm. Halfway, placebo has 15 of 50 better (30%). Pick the drug’s count.
Next, module 9 (CALGB 49907) uses this chance to stop a trial for futility.
Predict, then check
Real trials that stopped early
- CALGB 49907 (cancer trial): stopped early.
- ASTIN (stroke drug): stopped for futility. The trial had little chance of meeting its planned goal, so enrollment stopped.
- DAWN (clot removal after stroke): stopped enrollment at 206 patients because the predictive probability of a win (module 7, below) passed 95%. At the end, the chance clot removal was better was above 99.9%.
Sources: Sokolova and Sokolov (2026), Clinical Trials in Practice, which cites Krams et al. (2003, ASTIN) and Nogueira et al. (2018), NEJM, DAWN.
Takeaway
- Every extra look is another chance for a false alarm.
- Plan the looks first, and use stricter bars so false alarms stay at 2.5%.
- Stopping early saves patients, but the early estimate tends to be too big.
- Predictive probability is the chance of a win at the end, not how sure we are today.